<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Delightful Distraction&#187; Fox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delightfuldistraction.com/tag/fox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delightfuldistraction.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 04:54:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>lane bryant bias?</title>
		<link>http://www.delightfuldistraction.com/2280/lane-bryant-bias/</link>
		<comments>http://www.delightfuldistraction.com/2280/lane-bryant-bias/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 06:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Idol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dancing With The Stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lane bryant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victoria's secret]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delightfuldistraction.com/?p=2280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what&#8217;s this? bias against full-figured girls, that&#8217;s what! if you own a TV, you&#8217;ve been subject to one-too-many racy victoria&#8217;s secret commercials. you know, the ones with almost-naked stick figures with wind and silk and lace and&#8230; well, you get the picture. those were fiiiiine for TV networks FOX and ABC. but when lane bryant [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="549" height="332" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VMxyZQfMmM4&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="549" height="332" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VMxyZQfMmM4&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">what&#8217;s this? bias against full-figured girls, that&#8217;s what!</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">if you own a TV, you&#8217;ve been subject to one-too-many racy victoria&#8217;s secret commercials. you know, the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Eu1IIc_Y5M">ones</a> with almost-naked stick figures with wind and silk and lace and&#8230; well, you get the picture.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">those were fiiiiine for TV networks FOX and ABC. but when lane bryant came out with a lingerie commersh, the brakes were pumped! the  plus-size retailer <a href="http://www.lanebryant.com/content.jsp?pageName=RTWsweeps">claims</a> their above commercial was banned from ABC&#8217;s <em>dancing with the stars</em> and FOX&#8217;s <em>american idol</em> because they have a bias against full-figured models.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">FOX and ABC&#8217;s rebuttal? it flashes too much flesh for the  family-oriented shows. oh, and VS commercials don&#8217;t? uh huh.</p>
<p>the ad in question shows a curvy (and SEXY!) woman trying on various articles of lingerie, about to go &#8220;meet dan for lunch,&#8221; according to her smartphone appointment. she then heads out in a trenchcoat on, with nothing underneath but a bra and panties. presumeably for some lovin&#8217;!</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">a little racy for the family hour? perhaps, but it&#8217;s not too different from  any other lingerie ad on TV, except that the model is  voluptuous, not skinnier-than-skinny. what do you think? did FOX and ABC act out of line?</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.delightfuldistraction.com/2280/lane-bryant-bias/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>door #1, 2, or 3?</title>
		<link>http://www.delightfuldistraction.com/1285/the-raw-end/</link>
		<comments>http://www.delightfuldistraction.com/1285/the-raw-end/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conan O Brien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Leno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Late Night Lineups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Million Bucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pickle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Slot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tmz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tonight Show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delightfuldistraction.com/?p=1285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[unless you&#8217;ve been living under a rock, you&#8217;re aware that nbc is ousting conan o&#8217;brien from his &#8216;tonight show&#8217; spot to give it up for their golden child, jay leno. they only gave him 3 months! 3 months to prove himself is frankly not a fair enough shot. but, nbc doesn&#8217;t care. what they should [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://delightfuldistraction.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Picture-079.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1287  alignright" title="Picture 079" src="http://delightfuldistraction.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Picture-079.jpg" alt="" width="307" height="251" /></a>unless you&#8217;ve been living under a rock, you&#8217;re aware that nbc is ousting conan o&#8217;brien from his &#8216;tonight show&#8217; spot to give it up for their golden child, jay leno. they only gave him 3 months! 3 months to prove himself is frankly not a fair enough shot. but, nbc doesn&#8217;t care.</p>
<p>what they <em>should</em> care about is that they are in a bit of a pickle with conan&#8217;s contract. by trying to move the time of his show to after jay&#8217;s time slot, nbc is in breach of its agreement. which means, conan&#8217;s got a decision to make. according to <a href="http://www.tmz.com">tmz</a> and their sources, he has three options:</p>
<p><strong>1</strong><strong>)</strong> get outta the biz &amp; collect some checks&#8230; some BIG checks. if conan quits, nbc would have to pay him the value of his contract, up to $80 million bucks over the next 4 years.</p>
<p><strong>2)</strong> check out the view from other networks&#8217; late-night lineups. fox? abc? i&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll all come a-callin&#8217;. but if conan were to make a deal with a competing show, nbc would <em>still</em> have to pay him! let&#8217;s say fox paid him $10 mil/year. nbc would then have to ante up the reamining $10 mil to equal his original nbc contract. sounds good to me, mr. o&#8217;brien!</p>
<p><strong>3)</strong> orrrr, he could once again come second to jay leno and take the shortened 12:35-1:05am time slot.</p>
<p>so, what&#8217;ll it be, sir?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.delightfuldistraction.com/1285/the-raw-end/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>texty tv</title>
		<link>http://www.delightfuldistraction.com/1067/from-last-night/</link>
		<comments>http://www.delightfuldistraction.com/1067/from-last-night/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Bang Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case In Point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funny Things]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happy Madison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intoxication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Late Night]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popularity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitcom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Holland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stupor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tv Adaptation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tv Version]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twentysomething]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[When Was The Last Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delightfuldistraction.com/?p=1067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i gotta say, this could be kind of funny. fox is developing a tv adaptation loosely based on the website &#8216;texts from last night.&#8217; when was the last time we had a comedic sitcom based on the lives of those of us in our 20&#8242;s? perhaps this will help fill the void. writer steve holland (&#8216;the big bang [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1069" title="TFLN_header_oliv" src="http://delightfuldistraction.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/TFLN_header_oliv.jpg" alt="TFLN_header_oliv" width="558" height="119" /></p>
<p>i gotta say, this could be kind of funny. fox is <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118008348.html?categoryId=14&amp;cs=1">developing</a> a tv adaptation loosely based on the website &#8216;<a href="http://www.textsfromlastnight.com/">texts from last night</a>.&#8217; when was the last time we had a comedic sitcom based on the lives of those of us in our 20&#8242;s? perhaps this will help fill the void.</p>
<p>writer steve holland (&#8216;the big bang theory&#8217;) is set to pen the script with sony pictures &amp; happy madison producing. the tv version of the show will be based on &#8220;the whole idea of racy &#8211; and sometimes embarrassing &#8211; communication, particularly among the twentysomething set.&#8221;</p>
<p>while this may be hard to translate into a 30-minute show, it definitely has potential. people tend to do some funny things under the influence! case in point, the &#8216;texts from last night&#8217; website. readers log on to post texts they&#8217;ve sent or received from friends in the midst of intoxication or during a late-night stupor. let&#8217;s see if the writers can use the popularity of the website to give fox the hit that they&#8217;re looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.delightfuldistraction.com/1067/from-last-night/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>glee-less</title>
		<link>http://www.delightfuldistraction.com/1043/glee-less/</link>
		<comments>http://www.delightfuldistraction.com/1043/glee-less/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 03:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audiences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Champagne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cheerleaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fall Premiere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glee Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jokey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Spring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest Tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parting Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Premieres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shreds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitcom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tv Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whole Lot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delightfuldistraction.com/?p=1043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[last may, fox was convinced they had a hit with their latest tv show, &#8216;glee.&#8217; viewers were ecstatic over the preview of this musically-inclined sitcom. naturally, fox jumped for joy over the ratings &#38; fast-tracked the show into a fall premiere. but they might want to wait on the congratulatory champagne. the next set of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1044" title="gleeslider" src="http://delightfuldistraction.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/gleeslider.jpg" alt="gleeslider" width="307" height="251" /></p>
<p>last may, fox was convinced they had a hit with their latest tv show, &#8216;glee.&#8217; viewers were ecstatic over the preview of this musically-inclined sitcom. naturally, fox jumped for joy over the ratings &amp; fast-tracked the show into a fall premiere. but they might want to wait on the congratulatory champagne.</p>
<p>the next set of reviews are in. and <a href="http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117940959.html?categoryid=32&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562">variety</a> has ripped the hopeful hit to shreds! &#8220;talk about one-hit wonders,&#8221; the mag writes, &#8221;the promise &amp; energy associated with the debut of &#8216;glee&#8217; last spring largely evaporates.&#8221; the review purports that the series will be short-lived, to say the least.</p>
<p>did ya miss the preview last spring? lemme catch you up. it&#8217;s a look at romance through a high-school glee club. misfit singers, star quarterbacks, cheerleaders &amp; awkward teachers fill the cast &#8211; with the group occasionally bursting into song &amp; dance. variety says that while the cast has a whole lot of talent, it seems to be crushed alongside the show&#8217;s &#8220;jokey, cartoonish, wildly uneven tone.&#8221; we&#8217;ll see if audiences buy into the new show come this season. &#8216;glee&#8217; premieres on fox sept. 9th at 9pm. i&#8217;ll leave you with this parting shot from variety: in order for the show to last, &#8220;they&#8217;re gonna have to croon a tune helluva lot better than this!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.delightfuldistraction.com/1043/glee-less/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>a time &amp; a place</title>
		<link>http://www.delightfuldistraction.com/48/a-time-a-place/</link>
		<comments>http://www.delightfuldistraction.com/48/a-time-a-place/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 01:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Idol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crusade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Producers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shout Out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Split Screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time A Place]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tmz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delightfuldistraction.com/a-time-a-place/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[   last week, i was tuning in to some good ole american idol when BAM. we were all treated to a monstrous opinion over-share. performer katy perry likely went against the wishes of producers to show her affection for finalist adam lambert by fashioning his sequined name on her costume. while i&#8217;m sure adam lambert&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_CTIS9-F0jPw/ShIXqeorCJI/AAAAAAAAAu4/M3hg9210TH8/s1600-h/katy-perry-cape-adam-lamber.jpg"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5337354526933059730" style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; width: 400px; cursor: hand; height: 256px; text-align: center;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_CTIS9-F0jPw/ShIXqeorCJI/AAAAAAAAAu4/M3hg9210TH8/s400/katy-perry-cape-adam-lamber.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a>  </p>
<div><span style="color: #000000;">last week, i was tuning in to some good ole american idol when BAM. we were all treated to a monstrous opinion over-share. performer katy perry likely went against the wishes of producers to show her affection for finalist adam lambert by fashioning his sequined name on her costume. </span></div>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">while i&#8217;m sure adam lambert&#8217;s fans &#8211; or &#8220;glamberts&#8221; &#8211; were thrilled, FOX wasn&#8217;t quite as enthused. each performance on AI is edited after the fact and featured for purchase on iTunes. this little number, however, was edited so as not to show perry&#8217;s shout-out. TMZ has put together a split-screen of the live performance &amp; the edited iTunes bit so you can see the diff. i guess they thought we wouldn&#8217;t notice?! keep your opinions to yoself on the stage, katy! </span></p>
<div><a href="http://www.tmz.com/2009/05/18/katy-perry-victim-of-an-a-i-caped-crusade/"><span style="color: #000000;">http://www.tmz.com/2009/05/18/katy-perry-victim-of-an-a-i-caped-crusade/</span></a></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.delightfuldistraction.com/48/a-time-a-place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

