photoshop fun

kim-kardashian-photoshop-mistake-24722-1238075505-2

okay, we’re not stupid. we all know that celeb pics are touched & re-touched for magazine covers and the like. smoothing out the skin, fixing an unruly piece of hair… no biggie. today, complex magazine released a pre-photoshopped pic of kim kardashian, but quickly replaced it hours later. kim immediately spoke out, saying that yeah, she is a little curvy & she is proud of her cellulite. i love her attitude about it – reminding all of us that a lot of mag pics are idealistic, and not realistic.

kim’s bout with photoshop reminded me of the controversy around ms. faith hill on the cover of redbook magazine. i think it’s one thing to lighten the eyes, etc., but they sliced off inches from faith’s arm! come on, now. photoshoppers – stop taking it too far. there’s something to be said about natural beauty.

0720_faith_hill_photoshop000x0432x3061

oh angelina

i reaaallly hate to say this, but i was officially disappointed in anglina jolie last night at the SAG awards. first off, she had a major ‘tude with e!’s guiliana depandi. she just seemed so high & mighty. very short, very drab.

she got super touchy when guiliana asked a question about brad pitt, and see here’s the thing – okay, fine, you don’t want to talk about your very PUBLIC relationship with another actor? then don’t do magazine covers (‘people,’ ‘vanity fair’). and also… don’t be a celebrity. it is part of the job that entertainment reporters are gonna ask about your life! everyone else will play along at least a little bit. but oh no, not her! check out her obnoxiousness below:

do you agree? tude-alicious! and then when it came to her fashion choice, i again was a bit disappointed. let’s be honest, she is quite gorgeous. but i don’t think her dress showcased that at all! and it was verrrry boring. and was almost the exact same dress she wore to the Golden Globes just 2 weeks prior. in my opinion, she was definitely not one of the best dressed!

Golden Globes

 

 

SAG awards